Small businesses to lose Zurich insurance policies as part of Farmers cutback
By Jeff Amy
May 19, 2010, 7:01AM
BUSINESS icon
MOBILE, Ala. -- Zurich Financial Services will drop 554 small business property policies in Mobile and Baldwin counties beginning Oct. 1, citing risks from hurricane exposure. The move comes after Farmers Insurance Group, a Zurich unit that mainly covers homeowners, announced a larger cutback in February.
"This is an effort to manage our overall business volume and our coastal catastrophe exposure," said spokesman Mark Toohey.
He said the 554 policies represent a little more than half of the number of Zurich small business policies in Mobile and Baldwin counties, and about 10 percent of such policies statewide.
Company officials said they were not dropping all commercial wind coverage in Mobile and Baldwin counties. Independent agents who sell the policies, though, said they believe the insurer is exiting the market entirely.
"Zurich is pulling out," said Jay Ison, a partner in the Thames Batré Mattei Beville & Ison agency in Mobile.
The Swiss insurance titan took control of Farmers in 1998. In 2008, it combined its pre-existing small business line with Farmers, creating one of the five largest insurers for small business, with $2.3 billion in nationwide revenue.
Farmers said in February that it was dropping wind coverage on 10,000 residential policies in Mobile and Baldwin counties. It also dropped 400 small business policies sold by Farmers-brand agents. Toohey said those 400 policies represent just more than 30 percent of Farmers-brand small business policies in Mobile and Baldwin counties. Farmers agents can continue selling business coverage that excludes wind.
Zurich had largely stopped writing new business along the Alabama coast after 2004's Hurricane Ivan and 2005's Hurricane Katrina, agents said.
Gaylord Lyon, president of Mobile's Lyon Fry Cadden Insurance Agency, said about 40 of his customers have policies with Zurich right now. He said it would be hard to find equal coverage at the same price.
In the overall market, prices and availability are not as good as they were before Ivan. But things have improved, said Andrew Davis, a vice president with International Assurance Inc., a Mobile agency.
"Right after Ivan, if property was involved, your were going to pay through the nose," he said.
Ragan Ingram, chief of staff for Insurance Commissioner Jim Ridling, noted the decline in policies carried by the Alabama Insurance Underwriting Association, an insurer of last resort. "The department believes that commercial insurance is readily available in the Mobile and Baldwin marketplace," Ingram wrote in an e-mail.
He wrote that regulators know of no other carriers that are leaving.
By contrast, the states four largest homeowners carriers have announced that they are dropping wind coverage or all coverage on more than 50,000 homeowners policies since Ivan.
Monday, May 24, 2010
Monday, May 10, 2010
Editorial: Legislators need educating on coastal insurance
insurance
By Press-Register Editorial Board
May 10, 2010, 5:11AM
THIS YEAR’S session of the Legislature confirmed what property owners in southwest Alabama already knew: Key legislators have little or no understanding of what the crisis in the region’s homeowners’ insurance market means for the state as a whole.
While major insurers continued their retreat from the coast, dropping thousands of wind policies in Mobile and Baldwin counties, the Legislature failed to act on more than a half-dozen solid proposals for stabilizing the coastal insurance market.
Six insurance bills, including a seemingly noncontroversial requirement for the state’s insurer of last resort to refer to itself as the "wind pool" instead of using the misleading moniker "beach pool," went down in one Senate committee meeting. Sen. Lowell Barron, D-Fyffe, who once based his opposition to insurance reform on the distance from Fyffe to the Alabama coast, couldn’t get past a personality conflict with Sen. Ben Brooks, the Mobile Republican who sponsored several insurance bills. Sen. Barron said his colleague was "abrasive" and wanted others to "help him solve his problems."
Apparently Sen. Barron missed the point that the insurance bills were intended to help solve problems affecting thousands of property owners, the state’s revenue system and a huge chunk of Alabama’s $9 billion tourism industry.
Mobile and Baldwin counties generate $1.8 billion in state revenue. Another bad hurricane season — with the accompanying hit on coastal insurance — would wipe out tens of millions in tax revenue that Sen. Barron and his colleagues in north Alabama need to provide services for their own constitutuents.
The Legislature did approve one insurance bill this year: Sen. Trip Pittman’s measure to make it easier for "surplus lines carriers" — insurers whose rates aren’t regulated by the state — to enter the coastal market.
Any insurance legislation that promotes competition in the coastal counties helps, but most surplus lines companies have relatively high rates, and their policyholders are vulnerable if the companies go bankrupt.
In 2009, the Legislature passed a bill sponsored by Sen. Brooks that allows homeowners to reduce their premiums if they make their houses more hurricane-resistant. This measure, and Sen. Pittman’s surplus lines bill, do represent progress on the coastal insurance front, but the Legislature must do more than inch forward on an issue of major significance for the state’s economy.
Before the Legislature convenes next year, advocates of insurance reform need to launch an all-out campaign to educate senators and House members from north Alabama on the crisis in the coastal insurance market and its ramifications for their constituents. The Press-Register editorial board believes that if Sen. Barron and his allies truly realized what’s at stake in the debate, they would put aside regional and personal differences and get behind a plan to protect the economy of southwest Alabama.
By Press-Register Editorial Board
May 10, 2010, 5:11AM
THIS YEAR’S session of the Legislature confirmed what property owners in southwest Alabama already knew: Key legislators have little or no understanding of what the crisis in the region’s homeowners’ insurance market means for the state as a whole.
While major insurers continued their retreat from the coast, dropping thousands of wind policies in Mobile and Baldwin counties, the Legislature failed to act on more than a half-dozen solid proposals for stabilizing the coastal insurance market.
Six insurance bills, including a seemingly noncontroversial requirement for the state’s insurer of last resort to refer to itself as the "wind pool" instead of using the misleading moniker "beach pool," went down in one Senate committee meeting. Sen. Lowell Barron, D-Fyffe, who once based his opposition to insurance reform on the distance from Fyffe to the Alabama coast, couldn’t get past a personality conflict with Sen. Ben Brooks, the Mobile Republican who sponsored several insurance bills. Sen. Barron said his colleague was "abrasive" and wanted others to "help him solve his problems."
Apparently Sen. Barron missed the point that the insurance bills were intended to help solve problems affecting thousands of property owners, the state’s revenue system and a huge chunk of Alabama’s $9 billion tourism industry.
Mobile and Baldwin counties generate $1.8 billion in state revenue. Another bad hurricane season — with the accompanying hit on coastal insurance — would wipe out tens of millions in tax revenue that Sen. Barron and his colleagues in north Alabama need to provide services for their own constitutuents.
The Legislature did approve one insurance bill this year: Sen. Trip Pittman’s measure to make it easier for "surplus lines carriers" — insurers whose rates aren’t regulated by the state — to enter the coastal market.
Any insurance legislation that promotes competition in the coastal counties helps, but most surplus lines companies have relatively high rates, and their policyholders are vulnerable if the companies go bankrupt.
In 2009, the Legislature passed a bill sponsored by Sen. Brooks that allows homeowners to reduce their premiums if they make their houses more hurricane-resistant. This measure, and Sen. Pittman’s surplus lines bill, do represent progress on the coastal insurance front, but the Legislature must do more than inch forward on an issue of major significance for the state’s economy.
Before the Legislature convenes next year, advocates of insurance reform need to launch an all-out campaign to educate senators and House members from north Alabama on the crisis in the coastal insurance market and its ramifications for their constituents. The Press-Register editorial board believes that if Sen. Barron and his allies truly realized what’s at stake in the debate, they would put aside regional and personal differences and get behind a plan to protect the economy of southwest Alabama.
Sunday, May 9, 2010
Saturday, May 8, 2010
As Tennessee Copes With Flooding Disaster, FEMA Faces Own Financial Crisis
With a flooded Tennessee becoming the latest disaster to strike the United States, the Federal Emergency Management Agency is confronting its own emergency as its relief funds run perilously low.
Last month, FEMA Director W. Craig Fugate wrote a letter to Congress warning that its relief fund had fallen to $693 million as of April 7 but the agency owed $645 million to 47 states for past disasters. That doesn't include the $1.7 billion settlement the agency owes to the Gulf Coast state and city governments for Hurricane Katrina.
Now FEMA is handing out money to the residents of Tennessee after deadly floods ravaged the region last weekend.
FEMA has already approved $4.1 million in individual assistance and more than 16,200 Tennesseans had registered with FEMA for disaster assistance by Saturday morning with 650 inspections complete.
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Friday that FEMA will probably need a shot of supplemental funding. The administration is seeking $5.1 billion in emergency funding from Congress.
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano toured the area Saturday and found residents already repairing their homes and business owners pushing to re-open.
"DHS and the entire federal government will do everything possible to support the people of Tennessee and across the Southeast in getting back on their feet quickly -- coordinated every step of the way with our state and local partners," Napolitano said.
The outlook for the devastated areas of Tennessee, Mississippi and Kentucky remained grim Saturday as the death toll climbed to 31 with the discovery of a missing kayaker's body in Kentucky. Twenty died in Tennessee alone.
Nashville Mayor Karl Dean raised the damage estimate for his city to $1.5 billion Friday, with 17 percent of Davidson County still to be checked. Already officials know 9,300 properties have been damaged and almost 2,000 of those are residences. Dean said the damage total will go up because it doesn't include damage to roads, bridges or the contents of the buildings.
"While the numbers seem daunting, and they truly are large, Nashville is in the process of recovering," Dean said.
But some analysts believe FEMA was never meant to be -- and shouldn't be -- the disaster response agency for the nation.
"From an operational standpoint, disaster response should be driven by state and local governments, as they are the owners of most of the response resources and they are the first on the scene when disaster strikes," Jena Baker McNeill and Matt Mayer of the Heritage Foundation said in a report published last month. "Supplanting this funding encourages state and local governments to not be prepared, knowing that the federal government will bail them out."
The report found that the yearly average of FEMA declarations has tripled from 43 under the first President Bush to 89 under President Clinton to 130 under the second President Bush.
President Obama issued 108 declarations in his first year in office – the 12th highest in FEMA history – without the occurrence of one hurricane or other major disaster, the report said. In the first three months of 2010, Obama has issued 32 declarations, putting him on pace for 128 declarations for the year – the sixth most in FEMA history, according to the report.
The report says the reason behind the increase is governors, as their state budgets decline, are more likely to seek emergency declarations from FEMA that requires the federal government pay up to 100 percent of the disaster response bill.
"Truly catastrophic disasters that overwhelm state and local governments are a welcome forum for FEMA intervention; that is, after all, the very purpose of FEMA declarations," the report reads. "However, all too often disaster politics, rather than effective policy, drive decisions on disaster response. Washington policymakers simply do not know how to say 'no' to spending more on disasters. Consequently, FEMA can no longer meet its financial commitments."
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Last month, FEMA Director W. Craig Fugate wrote a letter to Congress warning that its relief fund had fallen to $693 million as of April 7 but the agency owed $645 million to 47 states for past disasters. That doesn't include the $1.7 billion settlement the agency owes to the Gulf Coast state and city governments for Hurricane Katrina.
Now FEMA is handing out money to the residents of Tennessee after deadly floods ravaged the region last weekend.
FEMA has already approved $4.1 million in individual assistance and more than 16,200 Tennesseans had registered with FEMA for disaster assistance by Saturday morning with 650 inspections complete.
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Friday that FEMA will probably need a shot of supplemental funding. The administration is seeking $5.1 billion in emergency funding from Congress.
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano toured the area Saturday and found residents already repairing their homes and business owners pushing to re-open.
"DHS and the entire federal government will do everything possible to support the people of Tennessee and across the Southeast in getting back on their feet quickly -- coordinated every step of the way with our state and local partners," Napolitano said.
The outlook for the devastated areas of Tennessee, Mississippi and Kentucky remained grim Saturday as the death toll climbed to 31 with the discovery of a missing kayaker's body in Kentucky. Twenty died in Tennessee alone.
Nashville Mayor Karl Dean raised the damage estimate for his city to $1.5 billion Friday, with 17 percent of Davidson County still to be checked. Already officials know 9,300 properties have been damaged and almost 2,000 of those are residences. Dean said the damage total will go up because it doesn't include damage to roads, bridges or the contents of the buildings.
"While the numbers seem daunting, and they truly are large, Nashville is in the process of recovering," Dean said.
But some analysts believe FEMA was never meant to be -- and shouldn't be -- the disaster response agency for the nation.
"From an operational standpoint, disaster response should be driven by state and local governments, as they are the owners of most of the response resources and they are the first on the scene when disaster strikes," Jena Baker McNeill and Matt Mayer of the Heritage Foundation said in a report published last month. "Supplanting this funding encourages state and local governments to not be prepared, knowing that the federal government will bail them out."
The report found that the yearly average of FEMA declarations has tripled from 43 under the first President Bush to 89 under President Clinton to 130 under the second President Bush.
President Obama issued 108 declarations in his first year in office – the 12th highest in FEMA history – without the occurrence of one hurricane or other major disaster, the report said. In the first three months of 2010, Obama has issued 32 declarations, putting him on pace for 128 declarations for the year – the sixth most in FEMA history, according to the report.
The report says the reason behind the increase is governors, as their state budgets decline, are more likely to seek emergency declarations from FEMA that requires the federal government pay up to 100 percent of the disaster response bill.
"Truly catastrophic disasters that overwhelm state and local governments are a welcome forum for FEMA intervention; that is, after all, the very purpose of FEMA declarations," the report reads. "However, all too often disaster politics, rather than effective policy, drive decisions on disaster response. Washington policymakers simply do not know how to say 'no' to spending more on disasters. Consequently, FEMA can no longer meet its financial commitments."
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
Update from Congressman Gene Taylor
Dear Friends,
The oil spill out in the Gulf is a big deal to all of us. It's deadly serious. Like you, I very much want to see the oil leak capped as quickly as possible. In fact, I wrote Secretary of Defense Robert Gates on Friday urging him to make available all of the resources of the U.S. military to help in the effort to stop the spill and mitigate its effects, and I spoke personally with Admiral Gary Roughead, Chief of Naval Operations for the Navy, who assured me that every resource of the United States Navy has been made available.
The good news is that because the oil rig was so far out to sea, the Mississippi coast is a long way from the source. As of today, there is no oil in the Mississippi Sound. That works in our favor.
On Saturday, I saw firsthand that the oil was further away from the Mississippi Sound and the Louisiana Marshes than the media had reported and predicted. Several days of heavy seas helped to break down some of the oil into a thin sheen. According to experts such as Dr. Bill Walker, Director of the Mississippi Department of Marine Resources, most of that oil sheen will evaporate in direct sunlight.
The thicker portions of the oil spill were still further offshore, closer to the source of the spill, so we still have time to prevent the worst-case scenario from happening. I have conferred with Admiral Thad Allen, the Commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard, and Captain Ed Stanton, the Federal On-Scene Coordinator for the Coast Guard, and I am confident that they are doing everything possible to minimize and mitigate the impact of the oil spill.
The people working to contain the spill have been encouraged that the dispersants sprayed on the oil at the surface and released near the oil leaks 5,000 feet below the surface are achieving the desired result of breaking-up the oil into smaller droplets and oil sheen—which, again, can more easily evaporate or naturally degrade. This is good news.
Thankfully, it appears that we are going to have a few days of good weather and calm seas that will allow the Coast Guard and other responders to contain and collect more of the oil-water mix and skim it into barges and tankers, or burn it in a controlled manner. Calmer winds also allow them to resume spraying dispersants from the air to continue to break up the thick portions of the spill.
Congress passed the Oil Pollution act of 1990 after the Exxon Valdez spill. Almost every response happening now is a result of that legislation that I voted for back then. The legislation calls on the oil companies to have virtually unlimited liability for the damages and the cleanup. BP is going to pay the bill, and the federal government will make sure that they do so.
I also want to make it clear that what is happening out in the Gulf is not the same as Hurricane Katrina, which was the most destructive natural disaster in our nation’s history. With Katrina, an estimated 70,000 Mississippi families were displaced from their homes, and 235 people died in our state alone.
Hurricane Katrina caused billions of dollars of property damage, of course, but it also caused substantial environmental damage. The storm surge pushed toxic chemicals, dead animal carcasses, raw sewage, and other hazardous debris all around the coastline and into coastal waters. So far, this oil spill has not caused nearly as much environmental damage as Katrina, and we all are working to keep it that way.
I continue to closely monitor the sub-surface efforts to stem the leak. I continue to work with the Coast Guard and other local, state, and federal agencies to ensure that individuals or companies that are interested in assisting with the response efforts are put in touch with the appropriate officials.
I assure you that this oil spill is being taken very seriously. But I also want to calm some of the hysteria that has resulted from those who have aired or published stories with doomsday headlines. Rather than adding to the panic, I am trying to accurately describe the current situation.
We are preparing for the worst and hoping for the best. That is how most of us live our lives. The Mississippi Department of Marine Resources is already training people to respond should help be necessary.
As a South Mississippian, I am very proud of the thousands of South Mississippians who have volunteered to help. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Rep. Gene Taylor's signature
GENE TAYLOR
Member of Congress
The oil spill out in the Gulf is a big deal to all of us. It's deadly serious. Like you, I very much want to see the oil leak capped as quickly as possible. In fact, I wrote Secretary of Defense Robert Gates on Friday urging him to make available all of the resources of the U.S. military to help in the effort to stop the spill and mitigate its effects, and I spoke personally with Admiral Gary Roughead, Chief of Naval Operations for the Navy, who assured me that every resource of the United States Navy has been made available.
The good news is that because the oil rig was so far out to sea, the Mississippi coast is a long way from the source. As of today, there is no oil in the Mississippi Sound. That works in our favor.
On Saturday, I saw firsthand that the oil was further away from the Mississippi Sound and the Louisiana Marshes than the media had reported and predicted. Several days of heavy seas helped to break down some of the oil into a thin sheen. According to experts such as Dr. Bill Walker, Director of the Mississippi Department of Marine Resources, most of that oil sheen will evaporate in direct sunlight.
The thicker portions of the oil spill were still further offshore, closer to the source of the spill, so we still have time to prevent the worst-case scenario from happening. I have conferred with Admiral Thad Allen, the Commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard, and Captain Ed Stanton, the Federal On-Scene Coordinator for the Coast Guard, and I am confident that they are doing everything possible to minimize and mitigate the impact of the oil spill.
The people working to contain the spill have been encouraged that the dispersants sprayed on the oil at the surface and released near the oil leaks 5,000 feet below the surface are achieving the desired result of breaking-up the oil into smaller droplets and oil sheen—which, again, can more easily evaporate or naturally degrade. This is good news.
Thankfully, it appears that we are going to have a few days of good weather and calm seas that will allow the Coast Guard and other responders to contain and collect more of the oil-water mix and skim it into barges and tankers, or burn it in a controlled manner. Calmer winds also allow them to resume spraying dispersants from the air to continue to break up the thick portions of the spill.
Congress passed the Oil Pollution act of 1990 after the Exxon Valdez spill. Almost every response happening now is a result of that legislation that I voted for back then. The legislation calls on the oil companies to have virtually unlimited liability for the damages and the cleanup. BP is going to pay the bill, and the federal government will make sure that they do so.
I also want to make it clear that what is happening out in the Gulf is not the same as Hurricane Katrina, which was the most destructive natural disaster in our nation’s history. With Katrina, an estimated 70,000 Mississippi families were displaced from their homes, and 235 people died in our state alone.
Hurricane Katrina caused billions of dollars of property damage, of course, but it also caused substantial environmental damage. The storm surge pushed toxic chemicals, dead animal carcasses, raw sewage, and other hazardous debris all around the coastline and into coastal waters. So far, this oil spill has not caused nearly as much environmental damage as Katrina, and we all are working to keep it that way.
I continue to closely monitor the sub-surface efforts to stem the leak. I continue to work with the Coast Guard and other local, state, and federal agencies to ensure that individuals or companies that are interested in assisting with the response efforts are put in touch with the appropriate officials.
I assure you that this oil spill is being taken very seriously. But I also want to calm some of the hysteria that has resulted from those who have aired or published stories with doomsday headlines. Rather than adding to the panic, I am trying to accurately describe the current situation.
We are preparing for the worst and hoping for the best. That is how most of us live our lives. The Mississippi Department of Marine Resources is already training people to respond should help be necessary.
As a South Mississippian, I am very proud of the thousands of South Mississippians who have volunteered to help. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Rep. Gene Taylor's signature
GENE TAYLOR
Member of Congress
Monday, May 3, 2010
Same house. Same repairs. Same insurer. Why different prices?
Print
Evidence suggests Allstate pays far more for flood repair than for wind damage. The reason? The government picks up the flood tab, and the company minimizes its own payout.
By Rebecca Mowbray - Times-Picayune, May 20, 2007
"For every dollar paid out of the federal treasury under flood, Allstate takes a credit and keeps a dollar. Essentially Allstate is profiting at the expense of the American taxpayer."
JOHN DENENEA
attorney for couple suing Allstate
Something about the insurance settlement on the Slidell townhouse seemed fishy to Chris Karpells, a prospective buyer who would be collecting the insurance money as part of the deal.
As he pored over the fine print, what caught Karpells' eye was this: Allstate seemed to have two different ways of pricing the damage repair costs, depending on whether the damage at 286 Marina Drive was chalked up to flooding or wind.
If Allstate attributed the damage to wind or rain, for example -- putting it on the hook for payment under the customer's homeowner policy -- the company priced the cost of removing and replacing the drywall at 76 cents per square foot. But if the damage was blamed on storm surge or flooding, the estimated cost of removing and replacing the drywall more than quadrupled, to $3.31 per square foot.
"On my best day, I couldn't get my client paid that much for Sheetrock. It would almost be misrepresentation or fraud," said Karpells, a registered public insurance adjuster as well as a real estate investor. "What the hell's the difference between wind Sheetrock and flood Sheetrock?"
A key difference between flood Sheetrock and wind Sheetrock is this: Allstate must pay for damage covered by its homeowner policy. But damage blamed on flooding is covered by the National Flood Insurance program, set up by the federal government and subsidized by taxpayers. And who decides which policy covers which damages? As with 96 percent of flood policies these days, it is the private insurer, in this case Allstate.
Drywall wasn't the only construction material cost that suddenly skyrocketed when Allstate was assigning the damage to the flood insurance program, Karpells noted.
The cost to recarpet the master bedroom, bathroom, loft and stairwell -- upstairs spaces that hadn't flooded and therefore were covered under the homeowner policy -- was pegged by Allstate at $23.48 a square foot. But when it came to replacing the same carpet in downstairs areas covered by the flood policy, Allstate set the price at $28.43, a 21 percent jump.
And so it went: For texturizing and repainting upstairs walls, Allstate set costs at 80 cents a square foot. The cost to the government program for apparently identical work downstairs: $1.15 per square foot, a difference of more than 40 percent.
Karpells said that, in his work as a public adjuster, he has seen the dual pricing on almost every Allstate adjustment that lists the damage line by line. And from his experience, Allstate is the only company that's doing it, said Karpells, a third-generation carpenter from Massachusetts who moved to Slidell several years before Katrina hit. Karpells said he believes that "someone is saying, 'On a flood policy, we use this database. On a wind policy, we use this database.' They're front-loading all the money on the flood policy."
Karpells is not alone in his suspicion that Allstate is gouging the government in order to minimize its own exposure to post-Katrina repair costs -- a charge Allstate flatly denies.
"Our firm position is that there are not any discrepancies in the rates charged," said Mike Trevino, a spokesman for Allstate. "The component prices reflect current market conditions. And they are the same for wind and flood."
Cindy Montgomery, a public adjuster from LaPorte, Texas, said she has seen the dual pricing in numerous Allstate cases in St. Tammany, Orleans and St. Bernard parishes and on the Mississippi Gulf Coast.
"I ended up with probably a hundred of these," said Montgomery, who is with Anchor Mitigation and Proof of Loss LLC. "Seventy-seven cents was nowhere near reality, and they knew it. I told them, and hundreds of other adjusters told them."
And the dual price list for repair costs has not been the only method of adjustment that lets Allstate be more generous with the public's money than its own.
Sometimes almost the entire burden is passed to the flood program. Down the street from the townhouse Karpells' business partner bought, for example, is Guy Smith's unit at 1546 Marina Drive: an almost identical townhouse with Allstate coverage and similar damage.
Even though both had flooded to the same depth, 42 to 48 inches, the financial burden at 1546 Marina Drive was tilted even more heavily to the federal insurance program, saving Allstate money. Smith was offered $170,927 for flood damage, while Allstate agreed to shoulder only $20,172 for roof and upstairs damage.
Indeed, in a one-page summary that contained no breakdown of costs or damages, Allstate's adjuster had declared that the appropriate response to damage at 1546 Marina Drive was to "replace" the three-story building, even though only the ground floor flooded.
"In my wildest dreams, I couldn't submit something like that and get it paid," Karpells said. "It's just so nonreflective of the damage that it's bizarre. The building was not destroyed. It was not a total loss."
Karpells thinks the flood damage at Smith's unit was probably about $80,000 to $85,000. Smith, a New Orleans firefighter, agrees that the unit wasn't a total loss. He was able to repair the damage and has been living in his townhouse since last September.
More disturbing still was the experience of Allstate customers Robert and Merryl Weiss, a Slidell couple who eventually took Allstate to court. As part of their flood insurance claim, Merryl Weiss drew up a handwritten list of damaged household contents, mostly fishing equipment. Her claim came to $38,848.35.
During depositions taken in connection with the litigation, they discovered that on the contents list submitted by Allstate for payment under the Weisses' flood policy, the value of the loss billed to the federal program had soared to more than $139,000. Fishing gear was nowhere on the list, but things had been added that the Weisses didn't even own, including furs, jewelry and the like.
"When Allstate pays a claim under a flood policy, they are using the checkbook of the United States Treasury. When they pay a claim under their homeowners policy, they are using the Allstate checkbook. For every dollar paid out of the federal treasury under flood, Allstate takes a credit and keeps a dollar. Essentially Allstate is profiting at the expense of the American taxpayer," Weiss attorney John Denenea said.
'It's apples to apples'
Allstate's Trevino declined to discuss the specifics of the claim on Karpells' townhouse, but said that the cost of repairs changes over time, and the cost of repairing one room versus another can vary, depending on how the damage occurred.
"The cost to repair wet drywall versus dry drywall is different. The cost to repair carpet from one room to carpet of another room may be different because you may have different quality carpet from room to room," Trevino said. "You can have different methods and approaches regarding paint. In one room, you may have one coat of paint, but in another room, you may need more than one coat of paint depending on the color."
Trevino further noted that public insurance adjusters, people who are hired to represent consumers after disasters to make sure they're paid properly, have an agenda.
Karpells rejected Trevino's insinuation that his profession as public adjuster was a factor in the dispute. The adjustments, he noted, were done for the previous owner of the townhouse at 246 Marina Drive. No public adjuster -- with or without an agenda -- was involved.
Moreover, Karpells argued, market fluctuations in repair costs couldn't account for the differences between prices on the flood and homeowner adjustments. They were done within two months of each other, too short a time for them to have been so extreme.
As for Trevino's suggestion that materials used upstairs might have been of different quality than those used downstairs: Not so, Karpells said. The carpet was the same on all floors, and the texture and paint on the walls was identical throughout the house.
"It's apples to apples," Karpells said. "The facts speak for themselves."
Craig Berthelot, vice president of the Home Builders Association of Greater New Orleans and owner of Berthelot Construction Services, which renovates and repairs storm-damaged homes in the New Orleans area, said that the real price for replacing drywall is between the prices that Allstate calculated.
Without the tear-out portion of the job, it costs about $2 to $2.50 per square foot to replace drywall, he said. The $3.31 billed to the flood program for tearing out and replacing drywall is high but more realistic than Allstate's 76 cents on the homeowners policy, Berthelot said.
The Katrina memo
Allstate is the nation's largest publicly held insurer of homes, autos and other personal risks. But when Katrina hit, the policies it had written in Louisiana were not backed up by reinsurance, a corporate policy that kicks in to cover an insurer's losses beyond a certain level in the event of a catastrophe like a hurricane.
Reinsurance paid for an estimated 45 percent of U.S. losses incurred by insurers as a result of the 2005 storms, according to the Insurance Information Institute, but Allstate was on the hook for the entire cost of damages covered by its Louisiana customers' homeowner policies. By the end of 2006, it had paid $1.4 billion in homeowners claims in Louisiana, where it is, after State Farm, the state's second-largest residential insurer.
Trevino said that reinsurance wouldn't have saved the company much money, and having to pay out of its own pocket didn't affect the company's generosity in handling claims. Nor did it inspire the company to slough off damages onto flood policies, he said.
Facing at least 200,000 claims after Katrina, the largest disaster it had confronted, the National Flood Insurance Program looked for ways to expedite payments to policyholders.
On Sept. 21, 2005, three weeks after the storm, acting flood program Director David Maurstad, who consulted regularly with insurers after the storm, issued a memo expediting the processing of flood claims.
The memo waived the requirements that customers prove their losses and instructed the insurance companies to pay the flood policy limits if the home was washed off of its foundation or if the home was in "standing water" for "an extended period of time."
Ed Pasterick, a senior adviser to the flood program, offered this explanation: "What we didn't want people to do was be penalized while we were determining if it was wind or water. He (Maurstad) just made a decision that he didn't want people to have suffer because of it."
The memo is widely credited with getting money into disaster victims' hands quickly and is upheld as an example of business and government working together to handle a challenging situation.
In hindsight, others have begun to wonder if it didn't send a signal to the private insurance industry that the federal treasury was their cookie jar and that no one would be looking if insurers helped themselves at the public's expense.
As the flood program went broke after Katrina, requiring a massive taxpayer bailout, U.S. Rep. Gene Taylor, D-Miss., began to ask pointed questions about how the rules got eased so quickly and in ways that were so advantageous to the private insurers. After all, FEMA, the agency that runs the flood program, was also the agency that had proved too hopelessly dysfunctional to make the adjustments that might have smoothed the flow of desperately needed public money to prostrate local governments.
"Our experience is that these guys didn't do anything to speed up the program anywhere else. Why did they do it here?" asked Brian Martin, a Slidell native who is Taylor's policy director. "I suspect that the idea came from the insurance companies."
Taylor's hunch is that the flood program eased its rules at the behest of the private insurers, who stood to benefit directly if the lion's share of losses could be laid off on the flood program, rather than homeowner policies.
"They get to go right out there and give them a check. It's from the federal government," Martin said. "It gives the homeowner something so that there's not huge pressure on the insurance company to pay something now.
"The flood insurance program made it easy for a few of the insurance companies to manipulate those claims to put it all on flooding," Martin said. "The taxpayers pick it all up."
"It was a very bad idea," said Bob Hunter, who oversaw the federal flood insurance program in the Ford and Carter administrations and now is a consumer advocate as director of insurance at the Consumer Federation of America. "It allowed these insurance companies to come in and say, 'This was all flood damage,' and hand out a check without any analysis of whether it was wind damage."
Officials bewildered
But even Hunter, skeptical as he was, didn't imagine that a company would develop two different price lists for nearly identical repair work. He thought the insurance companies would stop at trying to argue that damages were due to flooding, rather than wind. Indeed they have in a number of well-publicized lawsuits -- notably including U.S. Sen. Trent Lott's fight to recover more money from the homeowner policy that covered his destroyed waterfront home in Pascagoula, Miss.
The dual price lists are something else again. "I had no idea they would be so blatant," Hunter said.
FEMA also expressed bewilderment over the idea of charging government and private insurers different prices, when told about practices in the New Orleans area.
"I don't have an explanation for that," said Tim Johnson, senior insurance examiner on the claims section at FEMA. "If that's what they say is happening, I would love to see it. The overpayment surely does affect me."
The lack of uproar from customers is easier to understand. Essentially, claims adjustment, when both flood and homeowner policies are in play, is a zero-sum game. The customer wants insurance to cover the cost of repairing or replacing the house and has little reason to care whether the federal program or the private insurer foots the bill.
Smith, the firefighter who owns 1546 Marina Drive, said Allstate told him not to worry about whether the damage was attributed to wind or flood, that it would all come out in the wash. "It was basically, 'Look at the entire package, don't look at the wind claim for what it is, just look at the entire package,' " Smith said. "It was pretty clear."
Evidence suggests Allstate pays far more for flood repair than for wind damage. The reason? The government picks up the flood tab, and the company minimizes its own payout.
By Rebecca Mowbray - Times-Picayune, May 20, 2007
"For every dollar paid out of the federal treasury under flood, Allstate takes a credit and keeps a dollar. Essentially Allstate is profiting at the expense of the American taxpayer."
JOHN DENENEA
attorney for couple suing Allstate
Something about the insurance settlement on the Slidell townhouse seemed fishy to Chris Karpells, a prospective buyer who would be collecting the insurance money as part of the deal.
As he pored over the fine print, what caught Karpells' eye was this: Allstate seemed to have two different ways of pricing the damage repair costs, depending on whether the damage at 286 Marina Drive was chalked up to flooding or wind.
If Allstate attributed the damage to wind or rain, for example -- putting it on the hook for payment under the customer's homeowner policy -- the company priced the cost of removing and replacing the drywall at 76 cents per square foot. But if the damage was blamed on storm surge or flooding, the estimated cost of removing and replacing the drywall more than quadrupled, to $3.31 per square foot.
"On my best day, I couldn't get my client paid that much for Sheetrock. It would almost be misrepresentation or fraud," said Karpells, a registered public insurance adjuster as well as a real estate investor. "What the hell's the difference between wind Sheetrock and flood Sheetrock?"
A key difference between flood Sheetrock and wind Sheetrock is this: Allstate must pay for damage covered by its homeowner policy. But damage blamed on flooding is covered by the National Flood Insurance program, set up by the federal government and subsidized by taxpayers. And who decides which policy covers which damages? As with 96 percent of flood policies these days, it is the private insurer, in this case Allstate.
Drywall wasn't the only construction material cost that suddenly skyrocketed when Allstate was assigning the damage to the flood insurance program, Karpells noted.
The cost to recarpet the master bedroom, bathroom, loft and stairwell -- upstairs spaces that hadn't flooded and therefore were covered under the homeowner policy -- was pegged by Allstate at $23.48 a square foot. But when it came to replacing the same carpet in downstairs areas covered by the flood policy, Allstate set the price at $28.43, a 21 percent jump.
And so it went: For texturizing and repainting upstairs walls, Allstate set costs at 80 cents a square foot. The cost to the government program for apparently identical work downstairs: $1.15 per square foot, a difference of more than 40 percent.
Karpells said that, in his work as a public adjuster, he has seen the dual pricing on almost every Allstate adjustment that lists the damage line by line. And from his experience, Allstate is the only company that's doing it, said Karpells, a third-generation carpenter from Massachusetts who moved to Slidell several years before Katrina hit. Karpells said he believes that "someone is saying, 'On a flood policy, we use this database. On a wind policy, we use this database.' They're front-loading all the money on the flood policy."
Karpells is not alone in his suspicion that Allstate is gouging the government in order to minimize its own exposure to post-Katrina repair costs -- a charge Allstate flatly denies.
"Our firm position is that there are not any discrepancies in the rates charged," said Mike Trevino, a spokesman for Allstate. "The component prices reflect current market conditions. And they are the same for wind and flood."
Cindy Montgomery, a public adjuster from LaPorte, Texas, said she has seen the dual pricing in numerous Allstate cases in St. Tammany, Orleans and St. Bernard parishes and on the Mississippi Gulf Coast.
"I ended up with probably a hundred of these," said Montgomery, who is with Anchor Mitigation and Proof of Loss LLC. "Seventy-seven cents was nowhere near reality, and they knew it. I told them, and hundreds of other adjusters told them."
And the dual price list for repair costs has not been the only method of adjustment that lets Allstate be more generous with the public's money than its own.
Sometimes almost the entire burden is passed to the flood program. Down the street from the townhouse Karpells' business partner bought, for example, is Guy Smith's unit at 1546 Marina Drive: an almost identical townhouse with Allstate coverage and similar damage.
Even though both had flooded to the same depth, 42 to 48 inches, the financial burden at 1546 Marina Drive was tilted even more heavily to the federal insurance program, saving Allstate money. Smith was offered $170,927 for flood damage, while Allstate agreed to shoulder only $20,172 for roof and upstairs damage.
Indeed, in a one-page summary that contained no breakdown of costs or damages, Allstate's adjuster had declared that the appropriate response to damage at 1546 Marina Drive was to "replace" the three-story building, even though only the ground floor flooded.
"In my wildest dreams, I couldn't submit something like that and get it paid," Karpells said. "It's just so nonreflective of the damage that it's bizarre. The building was not destroyed. It was not a total loss."
Karpells thinks the flood damage at Smith's unit was probably about $80,000 to $85,000. Smith, a New Orleans firefighter, agrees that the unit wasn't a total loss. He was able to repair the damage and has been living in his townhouse since last September.
More disturbing still was the experience of Allstate customers Robert and Merryl Weiss, a Slidell couple who eventually took Allstate to court. As part of their flood insurance claim, Merryl Weiss drew up a handwritten list of damaged household contents, mostly fishing equipment. Her claim came to $38,848.35.
During depositions taken in connection with the litigation, they discovered that on the contents list submitted by Allstate for payment under the Weisses' flood policy, the value of the loss billed to the federal program had soared to more than $139,000. Fishing gear was nowhere on the list, but things had been added that the Weisses didn't even own, including furs, jewelry and the like.
"When Allstate pays a claim under a flood policy, they are using the checkbook of the United States Treasury. When they pay a claim under their homeowners policy, they are using the Allstate checkbook. For every dollar paid out of the federal treasury under flood, Allstate takes a credit and keeps a dollar. Essentially Allstate is profiting at the expense of the American taxpayer," Weiss attorney John Denenea said.
'It's apples to apples'
Allstate's Trevino declined to discuss the specifics of the claim on Karpells' townhouse, but said that the cost of repairs changes over time, and the cost of repairing one room versus another can vary, depending on how the damage occurred.
"The cost to repair wet drywall versus dry drywall is different. The cost to repair carpet from one room to carpet of another room may be different because you may have different quality carpet from room to room," Trevino said. "You can have different methods and approaches regarding paint. In one room, you may have one coat of paint, but in another room, you may need more than one coat of paint depending on the color."
Trevino further noted that public insurance adjusters, people who are hired to represent consumers after disasters to make sure they're paid properly, have an agenda.
Karpells rejected Trevino's insinuation that his profession as public adjuster was a factor in the dispute. The adjustments, he noted, were done for the previous owner of the townhouse at 246 Marina Drive. No public adjuster -- with or without an agenda -- was involved.
Moreover, Karpells argued, market fluctuations in repair costs couldn't account for the differences between prices on the flood and homeowner adjustments. They were done within two months of each other, too short a time for them to have been so extreme.
As for Trevino's suggestion that materials used upstairs might have been of different quality than those used downstairs: Not so, Karpells said. The carpet was the same on all floors, and the texture and paint on the walls was identical throughout the house.
"It's apples to apples," Karpells said. "The facts speak for themselves."
Craig Berthelot, vice president of the Home Builders Association of Greater New Orleans and owner of Berthelot Construction Services, which renovates and repairs storm-damaged homes in the New Orleans area, said that the real price for replacing drywall is between the prices that Allstate calculated.
Without the tear-out portion of the job, it costs about $2 to $2.50 per square foot to replace drywall, he said. The $3.31 billed to the flood program for tearing out and replacing drywall is high but more realistic than Allstate's 76 cents on the homeowners policy, Berthelot said.
The Katrina memo
Allstate is the nation's largest publicly held insurer of homes, autos and other personal risks. But when Katrina hit, the policies it had written in Louisiana were not backed up by reinsurance, a corporate policy that kicks in to cover an insurer's losses beyond a certain level in the event of a catastrophe like a hurricane.
Reinsurance paid for an estimated 45 percent of U.S. losses incurred by insurers as a result of the 2005 storms, according to the Insurance Information Institute, but Allstate was on the hook for the entire cost of damages covered by its Louisiana customers' homeowner policies. By the end of 2006, it had paid $1.4 billion in homeowners claims in Louisiana, where it is, after State Farm, the state's second-largest residential insurer.
Trevino said that reinsurance wouldn't have saved the company much money, and having to pay out of its own pocket didn't affect the company's generosity in handling claims. Nor did it inspire the company to slough off damages onto flood policies, he said.
Facing at least 200,000 claims after Katrina, the largest disaster it had confronted, the National Flood Insurance Program looked for ways to expedite payments to policyholders.
On Sept. 21, 2005, three weeks after the storm, acting flood program Director David Maurstad, who consulted regularly with insurers after the storm, issued a memo expediting the processing of flood claims.
The memo waived the requirements that customers prove their losses and instructed the insurance companies to pay the flood policy limits if the home was washed off of its foundation or if the home was in "standing water" for "an extended period of time."
Ed Pasterick, a senior adviser to the flood program, offered this explanation: "What we didn't want people to do was be penalized while we were determining if it was wind or water. He (Maurstad) just made a decision that he didn't want people to have suffer because of it."
The memo is widely credited with getting money into disaster victims' hands quickly and is upheld as an example of business and government working together to handle a challenging situation.
In hindsight, others have begun to wonder if it didn't send a signal to the private insurance industry that the federal treasury was their cookie jar and that no one would be looking if insurers helped themselves at the public's expense.
As the flood program went broke after Katrina, requiring a massive taxpayer bailout, U.S. Rep. Gene Taylor, D-Miss., began to ask pointed questions about how the rules got eased so quickly and in ways that were so advantageous to the private insurers. After all, FEMA, the agency that runs the flood program, was also the agency that had proved too hopelessly dysfunctional to make the adjustments that might have smoothed the flow of desperately needed public money to prostrate local governments.
"Our experience is that these guys didn't do anything to speed up the program anywhere else. Why did they do it here?" asked Brian Martin, a Slidell native who is Taylor's policy director. "I suspect that the idea came from the insurance companies."
Taylor's hunch is that the flood program eased its rules at the behest of the private insurers, who stood to benefit directly if the lion's share of losses could be laid off on the flood program, rather than homeowner policies.
"They get to go right out there and give them a check. It's from the federal government," Martin said. "It gives the homeowner something so that there's not huge pressure on the insurance company to pay something now.
"The flood insurance program made it easy for a few of the insurance companies to manipulate those claims to put it all on flooding," Martin said. "The taxpayers pick it all up."
"It was a very bad idea," said Bob Hunter, who oversaw the federal flood insurance program in the Ford and Carter administrations and now is a consumer advocate as director of insurance at the Consumer Federation of America. "It allowed these insurance companies to come in and say, 'This was all flood damage,' and hand out a check without any analysis of whether it was wind damage."
Officials bewildered
But even Hunter, skeptical as he was, didn't imagine that a company would develop two different price lists for nearly identical repair work. He thought the insurance companies would stop at trying to argue that damages were due to flooding, rather than wind. Indeed they have in a number of well-publicized lawsuits -- notably including U.S. Sen. Trent Lott's fight to recover more money from the homeowner policy that covered his destroyed waterfront home in Pascagoula, Miss.
The dual price lists are something else again. "I had no idea they would be so blatant," Hunter said.
FEMA also expressed bewilderment over the idea of charging government and private insurers different prices, when told about practices in the New Orleans area.
"I don't have an explanation for that," said Tim Johnson, senior insurance examiner on the claims section at FEMA. "If that's what they say is happening, I would love to see it. The overpayment surely does affect me."
The lack of uproar from customers is easier to understand. Essentially, claims adjustment, when both flood and homeowner policies are in play, is a zero-sum game. The customer wants insurance to cover the cost of repairing or replacing the house and has little reason to care whether the federal program or the private insurer foots the bill.
Smith, the firefighter who owns 1546 Marina Drive, said Allstate told him not to worry about whether the damage was attributed to wind or flood, that it would all come out in the wash. "It was basically, 'Look at the entire package, don't look at the wind claim for what it is, just look at the entire package,' " Smith said. "It was pretty clear."
Saturday, May 1, 2010
My letter to Senator Shelby
My letter to Senator Shelby
The Honorable Richard Shelby
335 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Shelby,
I want to thank you for taking the time to read this. I am writing this on behalf of the roughly 250,000 people of Mobile and surrounding areas, including Baldwin County, Al. I am an active member in the Eastern Shore Chamber of Commerce. I am involved in two committees, Governmental Affairs and the Insurance Sub Committee, as well as an Ambassador. My goal in writing you this letter is to inform you of the dire crisis we face as a community in South Alabama. Insurance Reform is no longer an option, but a crucial mandate for our area to survive, much less flourish.
I would not attempt to bring this to your attention if I did not feel it was a matter that is worthy of national attention. I am an Insurance Broker, specializing in Homeowners Insurance in Baldwin County. My clients consist of residents of Baldwin and Mobile county. I moved here around a year and a half ago, so I have a unique view of the situation. I have not witnessed a major storm on these shores, but as a former Catastrophic Claims Adjuster, I have been present in many dire situations. I was one of the first to arrive after a major hurricane/tornado. I have witnessed the devastation that a Category 3 or higher storm can bring to an area. Enough about me.
I understand that many think that there is no crisis affecting South Alabama. As I understand, this is where the wealthy folk of the State live and work. I myself have not met many of these wealthy people, but each and every day I talk to the average citizens that make up the bulk of our community.
In 1969 Hurricane Camille roared ashore, primarily on the Mississippi Coast. While doing substantial damage to both states, the storm quickly moved inland, flooding large areas of Kentucky and even West Virginia and Virginia (my home state).
In 1979, the one that people still mention to this day, Hurricane Frederic was the costliest hurricane to ever hit the Gulf Coast, until Andrew and Katrina. On the night of September 12th, my birthday, Fredric made landfall on Dauphin Island. This storm changed Gulf Shores and Alabama forever.
In 1997, Hurricane Danny entered the Gulf of Mexico and made landfall, affecting Alabama. Danny was widely known for the large amounts of rain fall and flood. Danny went on to affect Massachusetts with record rain and wind.
In 1998, Hurricane Georges affected Alabama, but causing far more damage in other states and countries, making landfall a total of seven times during its formation.
2004 gave the Gulf Coast Hurricane Ivan, making landfall with 132 mph winds. Gulf Shores took the brunt of this storm as a Category 3. This was an unusual storm, being the 6th most intense storm on record, with a minimum pressure of 910 millibars. Ivan may have the largest ocean wave ever recorded, ranging from 91 feet to 131 feet. Ivan also continued to proceed to the north, devastating Kentucky and Ohio with record amounts of rain and flood.
2005 was, well, the Katrina years. We all know about the destruction caused to New Orleans. While almost destroying New Orleans, it also caused damage here locally, in Alabama.
But, through all that, many of the residents and homes survived. And businesses re established and communities continue to try to grow.
First of all, to even attempt to predict the future, we must learn about the past. As I understand, several years ago, pre Katrina, hurricane deductibles were optional, allowing the homeowner to save premium by opting for a separate deductible. Generally, this deductible is a percentage of the structural amount. It is unknown to anyone why it’s a percent of the full structural amount, and not of the damage caused. For example, if the structure is insured for $200,000 and the damage is $50,000, a reasonable person would assume that the percentage of wind deductible would apply to the damage, not the structural coverage. A 5% deductible of the entire amount would equal $10,000. A 5% deductible of the damage would equal $2500.
Based on current conditions, there are no admitted carriers writing with wind. State Farm, like many coastal states, has begun to pick and choose the homes it wants to insure. Alfa, Farmers and Allstate recently cancelled or non-renewed up to 14,000 home here in the Mobile area. Imagine receiving that news in your mailbox one day. After 23 years, and no claims, the company you trusted for a combination of insurance products is no longer willing to insure you. Of course, keep in mind, the mortgage companies require wind/hail insurance on the home. So, you are forced to satisfy the mortgage requirements and find insurance somewhere. Well, for most cases, you have two options. Geovera, a non admitted carrier, or the Alabama Wind Pool, which is widely known as the carrier of last resort. So, you begin to call various agents attempting to receive quotes, which all come back the same because there simply is no competition to drive prices down. Many times, if there is no mortgage, the client will decide to self insure.
Homeowners are reporting rate increases of 250% since 2005. The homeowner then reads the Newspaper about more cancellations. As an example, Alfa cancels thousands of policies, then later announces they only made $500 million profit for the year. All the while, companies are cancelling insurance policies, but we are forced to watch their smiling faces on commercials. They tell us they are our friends and will take care of us when we need them, or how they can save us money by switching today.
Another thing to mention, is how the North part of the State, generally believes they are subsidizing our rates locally. A $200,000 home in North Alabama may cost $700 a year to insure. Many companies will fight for this business, all admitted carriers. Yet, twice a year, tornados will pass through and cause focused damage to towns all over the northern part of the State. Ripping off roofs, damaging buildings that are insured for moderate fees. That same home in Baldwin County would cost $2300 to insure, if it is even remotely close to the shore line.
So, to recap, many of the hurricanes caused damage here. No one will deny that. But, it also caused damage to inland cities and other states, such as Kentucky and Ohio. Northern Alabama will receive widespread damage, from tornados , twice a year, and we are paying the brunt of all of this.
Now, imagine the worst. It’s estimated by industry professionals locally that as much as 20% of homeowners in this area are uninsured, typically by choice as they simply cannot afford the premiums. A storm hits, 20% of this community will not be able to rebuild. They will be forced to spend savings to move to another part of the State, or even another part of the country. I think it’s safe to assume that another 20-40% will simply not rebuild here, due to fear of even higher increased fees from insurance companies. So now, we are left with 40-60% of a once thriving community. Mobile was recently named one of the top ten cities to quickly recover from a recession. With only 40% of the community left, devastated by a storm, the area’s population will likely continue to erode. Schools will no longer have the revenue to operate, as a large portion of the tax base will have left the area. Our schools are already underfunded, like many across the country. It’s estimated that they have 16 hours worth of funds needed to operate in a crisis. Businesses will begin to shut down, because they simply have no traffic to generate revenue. Home Depot’s, hotels, restaurants and movie theatres will close their doors. Over a very short period of time, this area will be a shell of its former self.
A young couple decides to venture out into life and purchase a new home. With a $800 a month budget, options are great right now. They go to a Realtor to view houses. They choose the perfect home to begin their family. Unfortunately, the home costs $1000 a month. Well, they can trim back on the cell phone, cut the cable bill and make that extra $200 a month available. It’s a stretch, but it’s also a dream. Then the Realtor contacts me, and the price is another $240 a month for insurance. So, the builder doesn’t sell a home. The Realtor doesn’t sell a home. The insurance agent doesn’t write a policy. An industry segment is not stimulated to continue. And lets not forget, the most important factor, a young couple doesn’t realize their dreams in starting a new family.
As I have explained, we are in a crisis. It invades everyone’s minds, dominates almost every casual conversation. It’s the top news topic for this area. Just today, on the front page, we read how Farmers Insurance is cancelling another 10,400 policies. Its estimated that over 50,000 policies have been dropped/non renewed since 2005. What part of this situation is not a crisis? We are caught in a political situation that lets the wants of a few dictate the needs of many. We are in a situation where the insurance companies are running the State, not the State running the insurance companies. Insurance is primarily based upon the Law of Large Numbers. The profits of many gain more than the loss of a few. Insurance is not a guarantee, yet the insurance companies are creating that. I am not one that is against profit. Profit creates wealth, wealth creates industry. I own two businesses here locally; I get up every morning to make money. However, when a company that pulls out from insuring the area, cancels thousands of policies states that they only made a $500 million profit for the year, the general populace gets confused, me being one of them. How can the northern part of the State claim to subsidize us when we pay the outrageous rates? These storms, as stated above, do damage here. But they also do damage in other states, far north of us. We just pay the rates associated with the damage. Locals are beginning to get angry about the current status here. I have heard mention that we hold 40% of the State’s tourism dollar, with all of the States Gulf Oil revenue. This is estimated to be 30% of the entire States revenue. One gets the feeling that people will no longer be satisfied with asking and will start demanding our representatives to represent us. I firmly believe that we have to start with building better homes, more wind resistant. I also believe that until we give competition a reason to compete, we will remain in this situation. There is a local uproar about where the money is going that we contribute, only to be told by State Senator Lloyd Barron “I am 400 miles away from the coast line, I don’t have to care about the insurance rates.” Sen. Roger Bedford, D-Russellville is quoted as stating “that north Alabama lawmakers would frown on subsidizing the Gulf Coast. “ People are angry because we are sending all this money north, only to pay three to four times what others in the State are paying. People can only be consoled for so long before they begin to react. State Senator Ben Brooks and State Senator Tripp Pittman work hard to take ideas, write a bill proposal, only to encounter repeated resistance from law makers in North Alabama. Why? For fear of rate increases to their constituents? Or fear of reprimand from the large PAC’s that they represent? When a representative of my State, of any part of it, tells me how they do not care about my quality of life, it breaks down my belief in the entire system of government we have in place.
My goal is to achieve insurance reform. I intend to make this a State, and if possible, a national issue. So often our Federal and State governments come in after the disaster to provide assistance. For once, lets be involved before the disaster hits to minimize the disaster itself. I honestly do not know what the solution is. I talk to others on the matter every day. There are some sane and some radical ideas presented, but the worst ideas are those unspoken. We need to address this situation immediately, before we watch history re written, in a way that will not be remembered well. It starts with competition and knowledge. We cannot stop the hurricanes, but we can build more wind resistant homes. We can give tax incentives to citizens that will retro fit with safety features such as wind resistant windows, hurricane straps, etc. We can work with the insurance companies to develop a plan to keep this area insured, instead of working against the insurance companies. We can have better State regulation. We can have more informed citizens by instructing on how to prepare for a storm, how to prepare for claims. We simply must find a way to allow this area to be insurable again. After all, the only thing worse than high priced insurance is no insurance at all. Please focus your attention on this matter, the crisis that we are facing. We have continued to face this alone, feeling separated and alienated from the rest of our State. We also feel that our Northern representatives are not representing the interests of the entire State. It is of utmost importance that we act now, today, this very minute.
Sincerely,
Jason Horn
The Insurance Guy
Daphne, Al.
Jason.horn@mchsi.com
251-445-8777
The Honorable Richard Shelby
335 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Senator Shelby,
I want to thank you for taking the time to read this. I am writing this on behalf of the roughly 250,000 people of Mobile and surrounding areas, including Baldwin County, Al. I am an active member in the Eastern Shore Chamber of Commerce. I am involved in two committees, Governmental Affairs and the Insurance Sub Committee, as well as an Ambassador. My goal in writing you this letter is to inform you of the dire crisis we face as a community in South Alabama. Insurance Reform is no longer an option, but a crucial mandate for our area to survive, much less flourish.
I would not attempt to bring this to your attention if I did not feel it was a matter that is worthy of national attention. I am an Insurance Broker, specializing in Homeowners Insurance in Baldwin County. My clients consist of residents of Baldwin and Mobile county. I moved here around a year and a half ago, so I have a unique view of the situation. I have not witnessed a major storm on these shores, but as a former Catastrophic Claims Adjuster, I have been present in many dire situations. I was one of the first to arrive after a major hurricane/tornado. I have witnessed the devastation that a Category 3 or higher storm can bring to an area. Enough about me.
I understand that many think that there is no crisis affecting South Alabama. As I understand, this is where the wealthy folk of the State live and work. I myself have not met many of these wealthy people, but each and every day I talk to the average citizens that make up the bulk of our community.
In 1969 Hurricane Camille roared ashore, primarily on the Mississippi Coast. While doing substantial damage to both states, the storm quickly moved inland, flooding large areas of Kentucky and even West Virginia and Virginia (my home state).
In 1979, the one that people still mention to this day, Hurricane Frederic was the costliest hurricane to ever hit the Gulf Coast, until Andrew and Katrina. On the night of September 12th, my birthday, Fredric made landfall on Dauphin Island. This storm changed Gulf Shores and Alabama forever.
In 1997, Hurricane Danny entered the Gulf of Mexico and made landfall, affecting Alabama. Danny was widely known for the large amounts of rain fall and flood. Danny went on to affect Massachusetts with record rain and wind.
In 1998, Hurricane Georges affected Alabama, but causing far more damage in other states and countries, making landfall a total of seven times during its formation.
2004 gave the Gulf Coast Hurricane Ivan, making landfall with 132 mph winds. Gulf Shores took the brunt of this storm as a Category 3. This was an unusual storm, being the 6th most intense storm on record, with a minimum pressure of 910 millibars. Ivan may have the largest ocean wave ever recorded, ranging from 91 feet to 131 feet. Ivan also continued to proceed to the north, devastating Kentucky and Ohio with record amounts of rain and flood.
2005 was, well, the Katrina years. We all know about the destruction caused to New Orleans. While almost destroying New Orleans, it also caused damage here locally, in Alabama.
But, through all that, many of the residents and homes survived. And businesses re established and communities continue to try to grow.
First of all, to even attempt to predict the future, we must learn about the past. As I understand, several years ago, pre Katrina, hurricane deductibles were optional, allowing the homeowner to save premium by opting for a separate deductible. Generally, this deductible is a percentage of the structural amount. It is unknown to anyone why it’s a percent of the full structural amount, and not of the damage caused. For example, if the structure is insured for $200,000 and the damage is $50,000, a reasonable person would assume that the percentage of wind deductible would apply to the damage, not the structural coverage. A 5% deductible of the entire amount would equal $10,000. A 5% deductible of the damage would equal $2500.
Based on current conditions, there are no admitted carriers writing with wind. State Farm, like many coastal states, has begun to pick and choose the homes it wants to insure. Alfa, Farmers and Allstate recently cancelled or non-renewed up to 14,000 home here in the Mobile area. Imagine receiving that news in your mailbox one day. After 23 years, and no claims, the company you trusted for a combination of insurance products is no longer willing to insure you. Of course, keep in mind, the mortgage companies require wind/hail insurance on the home. So, you are forced to satisfy the mortgage requirements and find insurance somewhere. Well, for most cases, you have two options. Geovera, a non admitted carrier, or the Alabama Wind Pool, which is widely known as the carrier of last resort. So, you begin to call various agents attempting to receive quotes, which all come back the same because there simply is no competition to drive prices down. Many times, if there is no mortgage, the client will decide to self insure.
Homeowners are reporting rate increases of 250% since 2005. The homeowner then reads the Newspaper about more cancellations. As an example, Alfa cancels thousands of policies, then later announces they only made $500 million profit for the year. All the while, companies are cancelling insurance policies, but we are forced to watch their smiling faces on commercials. They tell us they are our friends and will take care of us when we need them, or how they can save us money by switching today.
Another thing to mention, is how the North part of the State, generally believes they are subsidizing our rates locally. A $200,000 home in North Alabama may cost $700 a year to insure. Many companies will fight for this business, all admitted carriers. Yet, twice a year, tornados will pass through and cause focused damage to towns all over the northern part of the State. Ripping off roofs, damaging buildings that are insured for moderate fees. That same home in Baldwin County would cost $2300 to insure, if it is even remotely close to the shore line.
So, to recap, many of the hurricanes caused damage here. No one will deny that. But, it also caused damage to inland cities and other states, such as Kentucky and Ohio. Northern Alabama will receive widespread damage, from tornados , twice a year, and we are paying the brunt of all of this.
Now, imagine the worst. It’s estimated by industry professionals locally that as much as 20% of homeowners in this area are uninsured, typically by choice as they simply cannot afford the premiums. A storm hits, 20% of this community will not be able to rebuild. They will be forced to spend savings to move to another part of the State, or even another part of the country. I think it’s safe to assume that another 20-40% will simply not rebuild here, due to fear of even higher increased fees from insurance companies. So now, we are left with 40-60% of a once thriving community. Mobile was recently named one of the top ten cities to quickly recover from a recession. With only 40% of the community left, devastated by a storm, the area’s population will likely continue to erode. Schools will no longer have the revenue to operate, as a large portion of the tax base will have left the area. Our schools are already underfunded, like many across the country. It’s estimated that they have 16 hours worth of funds needed to operate in a crisis. Businesses will begin to shut down, because they simply have no traffic to generate revenue. Home Depot’s, hotels, restaurants and movie theatres will close their doors. Over a very short period of time, this area will be a shell of its former self.
A young couple decides to venture out into life and purchase a new home. With a $800 a month budget, options are great right now. They go to a Realtor to view houses. They choose the perfect home to begin their family. Unfortunately, the home costs $1000 a month. Well, they can trim back on the cell phone, cut the cable bill and make that extra $200 a month available. It’s a stretch, but it’s also a dream. Then the Realtor contacts me, and the price is another $240 a month for insurance. So, the builder doesn’t sell a home. The Realtor doesn’t sell a home. The insurance agent doesn’t write a policy. An industry segment is not stimulated to continue. And lets not forget, the most important factor, a young couple doesn’t realize their dreams in starting a new family.
As I have explained, we are in a crisis. It invades everyone’s minds, dominates almost every casual conversation. It’s the top news topic for this area. Just today, on the front page, we read how Farmers Insurance is cancelling another 10,400 policies. Its estimated that over 50,000 policies have been dropped/non renewed since 2005. What part of this situation is not a crisis? We are caught in a political situation that lets the wants of a few dictate the needs of many. We are in a situation where the insurance companies are running the State, not the State running the insurance companies. Insurance is primarily based upon the Law of Large Numbers. The profits of many gain more than the loss of a few. Insurance is not a guarantee, yet the insurance companies are creating that. I am not one that is against profit. Profit creates wealth, wealth creates industry. I own two businesses here locally; I get up every morning to make money. However, when a company that pulls out from insuring the area, cancels thousands of policies states that they only made a $500 million profit for the year, the general populace gets confused, me being one of them. How can the northern part of the State claim to subsidize us when we pay the outrageous rates? These storms, as stated above, do damage here. But they also do damage in other states, far north of us. We just pay the rates associated with the damage. Locals are beginning to get angry about the current status here. I have heard mention that we hold 40% of the State’s tourism dollar, with all of the States Gulf Oil revenue. This is estimated to be 30% of the entire States revenue. One gets the feeling that people will no longer be satisfied with asking and will start demanding our representatives to represent us. I firmly believe that we have to start with building better homes, more wind resistant. I also believe that until we give competition a reason to compete, we will remain in this situation. There is a local uproar about where the money is going that we contribute, only to be told by State Senator Lloyd Barron “I am 400 miles away from the coast line, I don’t have to care about the insurance rates.” Sen. Roger Bedford, D-Russellville is quoted as stating “that north Alabama lawmakers would frown on subsidizing the Gulf Coast. “ People are angry because we are sending all this money north, only to pay three to four times what others in the State are paying. People can only be consoled for so long before they begin to react. State Senator Ben Brooks and State Senator Tripp Pittman work hard to take ideas, write a bill proposal, only to encounter repeated resistance from law makers in North Alabama. Why? For fear of rate increases to their constituents? Or fear of reprimand from the large PAC’s that they represent? When a representative of my State, of any part of it, tells me how they do not care about my quality of life, it breaks down my belief in the entire system of government we have in place.
My goal is to achieve insurance reform. I intend to make this a State, and if possible, a national issue. So often our Federal and State governments come in after the disaster to provide assistance. For once, lets be involved before the disaster hits to minimize the disaster itself. I honestly do not know what the solution is. I talk to others on the matter every day. There are some sane and some radical ideas presented, but the worst ideas are those unspoken. We need to address this situation immediately, before we watch history re written, in a way that will not be remembered well. It starts with competition and knowledge. We cannot stop the hurricanes, but we can build more wind resistant homes. We can give tax incentives to citizens that will retro fit with safety features such as wind resistant windows, hurricane straps, etc. We can work with the insurance companies to develop a plan to keep this area insured, instead of working against the insurance companies. We can have better State regulation. We can have more informed citizens by instructing on how to prepare for a storm, how to prepare for claims. We simply must find a way to allow this area to be insurable again. After all, the only thing worse than high priced insurance is no insurance at all. Please focus your attention on this matter, the crisis that we are facing. We have continued to face this alone, feeling separated and alienated from the rest of our State. We also feel that our Northern representatives are not representing the interests of the entire State. It is of utmost importance that we act now, today, this very minute.
Sincerely,
Jason Horn
The Insurance Guy
Daphne, Al.
Jason.horn@mchsi.com
251-445-8777
Editorial: It's not just south Alabama that's affected by hurricanes
Editorial: It's not just south Alabama that's affected by hurricanes
By Press-Register Editorial Board
April 08, 2010, 9:00AM
THE LATE-session massacre of six coastal insurance bills left Mobile and Baldwin residents to wonder whether the powerbrokers in the Legislature understand the importance of the coastal counties to the state’s economy.
Lawmakers like Sen. Lowell Barron, a Democrat from Fyffe, seem to only grudgingly accept that Mobile and Baldwin counties are part of the state of Alabama.
During a debate two years ago on bills designed to bolster the struggling homeowners’ insurance market in southwest Alabama, Sen. Barron advised Sen. Ben Brooks, R-Mobile, that he didn’t have to support his insurance proposals because Fyffe was a long way — about 400 miles — from Mobile.
It’s hard to top that expression of parochialism, but Sen. Barron may have done it last week when he explained why he was, once again, opposing Sen. Brooks’ insurance reform bills.
"He’s just an abrasive personality," Sen. Barron said, referring to his colleague from Mobile. "He doesn’t understand the legislative process enough to get others to help him solve his problems."
Sen. Barron obviously personalizes the legislative process to the extent that he cannot recognize a problem that affects the entire state, including Fyffe.
To be fair, Sen. Barron also invoked the hazards of government intrusion in private business as a reason for opposing the insurance bills.
But we suspect that this was just a high-minded cover for the personal and parochial considerations that drive his opposition to virtually all efforts to help property owners in Mobile and Baldwin.
Since 2004, the state’s major insurers have dropped wind coverage for more than 51,000 policyholders in Mobile and Baldwin.
Thousands of homeowners have been forced to buy high-priced wind coverage from the wind pool, the state’s insurer of last resort.
Thousands more have watched their insurance premiums soar by as much as 100 percent in just a few years.
This is a problem for all of Alabama. The coastal counties anchor the state’s $9 billion tourism industry.
State Revenue Commissioner Tim Russell says Mobile and Baldwin generate $1.8 billion in state revenue.
Indeed, almost 20 percent of the state’s take from individual income taxes comes from Mobile and Baldwin residents.
The insurance crisis already is hurting the coastal economy, and the problem will likely get worse unless the Legislature takes action to provide some relief.
If the coastal economy, hammered by soaring insurance rates, stops generating its usual share of state revenue, those who’ve thwarted insurance reform will be hard-pressed to defend their narrow view of state priorities.
By Press-Register Editorial Board
April 08, 2010, 9:00AM
THE LATE-session massacre of six coastal insurance bills left Mobile and Baldwin residents to wonder whether the powerbrokers in the Legislature understand the importance of the coastal counties to the state’s economy.
Lawmakers like Sen. Lowell Barron, a Democrat from Fyffe, seem to only grudgingly accept that Mobile and Baldwin counties are part of the state of Alabama.
During a debate two years ago on bills designed to bolster the struggling homeowners’ insurance market in southwest Alabama, Sen. Barron advised Sen. Ben Brooks, R-Mobile, that he didn’t have to support his insurance proposals because Fyffe was a long way — about 400 miles — from Mobile.
It’s hard to top that expression of parochialism, but Sen. Barron may have done it last week when he explained why he was, once again, opposing Sen. Brooks’ insurance reform bills.
"He’s just an abrasive personality," Sen. Barron said, referring to his colleague from Mobile. "He doesn’t understand the legislative process enough to get others to help him solve his problems."
Sen. Barron obviously personalizes the legislative process to the extent that he cannot recognize a problem that affects the entire state, including Fyffe.
To be fair, Sen. Barron also invoked the hazards of government intrusion in private business as a reason for opposing the insurance bills.
But we suspect that this was just a high-minded cover for the personal and parochial considerations that drive his opposition to virtually all efforts to help property owners in Mobile and Baldwin.
Since 2004, the state’s major insurers have dropped wind coverage for more than 51,000 policyholders in Mobile and Baldwin.
Thousands of homeowners have been forced to buy high-priced wind coverage from the wind pool, the state’s insurer of last resort.
Thousands more have watched their insurance premiums soar by as much as 100 percent in just a few years.
This is a problem for all of Alabama. The coastal counties anchor the state’s $9 billion tourism industry.
State Revenue Commissioner Tim Russell says Mobile and Baldwin generate $1.8 billion in state revenue.
Indeed, almost 20 percent of the state’s take from individual income taxes comes from Mobile and Baldwin residents.
The insurance crisis already is hurting the coastal economy, and the problem will likely get worse unless the Legislature takes action to provide some relief.
If the coastal economy, hammered by soaring insurance rates, stops generating its usual share of state revenue, those who’ve thwarted insurance reform will be hard-pressed to defend their narrow view of state priorities.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)